When I was considering books for Brona’s Australian Reading Week I caught sight Katharine Susannah Prichard’s Goldfields Trilogy caught eye from the top shelf of the Virago bookcase. I have read much praise for the author and those books look wonderful, but it wasn’t the time for me to embark on a new series and, as those books came late in a writing career, I though there might be a good, earlier novel for me to try first.
There was – a novel from 1926 named ‘Haxby’s Circus’ – I loved it.
I read that Katharine Susannah Prichard travelled with a circus when she was researching this novel, and I think it shows. The pictures she paints of the people and their world are wonderful.
“Cars and buggies, far away on the dark road, flickered like fireflies, coming into the town, converging round the restless spangle of lights in the paddock beside the river where the circus had camped.
Under starry skies, across the dim palms, gay blare and tinkle of the circus band flew far and wide.
the tents erected during the morning glowed like a crop of luminous toadstools. Smoking flares showed gaily caparisoned horses, fantastically clad riders moving in and out from the dark behind the tents. Crowds of men, women and children from the town and surrounding farms, seethed across the dark paddocks towards them … “
At the centre of the stage is Dan Haxby, proprietor and ring-master. The circus is his life, his world, and his family are all part of it. He loves his family, but he takes it for granted that for them – as for him – the circus means everything.
And it does.
But when his daughter, Gina, a young bareback rider, is badly hurt and must spend months recuperating in hospital things change. Gina is left behind, because, of course, the show must go on. Her spirit and the stories she has to sell impress the hospital staff, and their care and stories of their lives make an impression on Gina; she begins to realise that there are other ways to live and she begins to question her father’s attitude and her mother’s unquestioning loyalty to him.
Gina learns to walks again, against the odds, but her back is hunched and she will never be able to do many of the things that she did before. She returns to the circus, partly because it is her home and partly because she has nowhere else to go. There is no place for her but she is determined to make one, to make things better, and to put her life back together.
This is Gina’s story and she is a wonderful character. She has strengths – her determination, her love for her family, her will – and her practical efforts – to make things better; and she has weaknesses – blind-spots, too many things that she cannot see or cannot understand.
She doesn’t understand that, though her life is hard, the only place her mother wants to be as it her father’s side, working hard, giving her life, for the circus.
She doesn’t understand that she is spoiling her talented little sister, Max – maybe to fill a void in her life – and that she cannot protect her from life’s harsh realities.
And she does not believe that she could be loved.
Sometimes she was infuriating, but she was always engaging.
The book follows the course of her life, through good times and bad ties, through an age where the cinema is drawing audiences away from the circus. That makes the plot feel a little uneven, and there were one or two things that stretched credibility. But the story held me, and the writing style suited it beautifully.
The cast of characters was wonderful – Dan was the ultimate showman; the story of his wife, Lotty, was heartbreakingly believable; Max was so clearly what her life and her circumstances had made her; Rocca, the dwarf clown, had such perfect understanding of his own reality, and though his appearance was short his role was pivotal; Paul Bach, tamer of wild beasts, was close to Gina but I feared for her and I was right ….
I wish some of the characters in the background had been filled in a little – Gina’s sister and her husband, and her blur of brothers – though the story was full enough
But drawing of Haxby’s Circus was wonderful from start to finish. This circus story said much about life, family, the consequences of how we choose to live; the later chapters speak so profoundly about ageing, about loss and acceptance.
And then the final twist made me catch my breath ….
What is it about circuses that is so intriguing? When I was little I always wanted to run away and join the circus…do trick-riding or become an aerialist. This book sounds delightful. I’m so glad you shared your thoughts on it. You’ve made me want to read it, too. 🙂
I love circuses in books, because I can run away without all of the practical problems. This book isn’t perfect, but it catches the circus and the people so well that I’d say it’s a must-read for circus lovers.
This is another new author to me! I didn’t get to many circuses as a child, I think because we lived in small towns, but I love reading about them as well.
We had an annual visit from a touring circus, but I found the noise and colour rather overwhelming – but I love them in books!
Sounds like a great read
Yes, it was, and I’m very curious to read Katharine Susannah Prichard’s other books, that touch on bigger social issues.
Thank you for highlighting such an intriguing Australian author.
I have not read any of her novels, but I know a little about her thanks to my history classes. She was one of the founding members of the Australian Communist Party.
She also had a mentor-type relationship with David Helfgot – the pianist made famous by Geoffrey Rush in the movie Shine.
I would like to read her Goldfield’s trilogy one day. And Coonardoo – her book about a love affair between an Aboriginal woman and white man set in the 1920’s. She was unable to get it published in Australia, even though it won an Australian writing award. She had to go to London for a publisher.
Thanks for joining in AusReading Month 🙂
Thank you for the extra information – Katharine Susannah Prichard was clearly an interesting woman as well as a very good writer, and I have a biography on my wishlist.
“Sometimes she was infuriating, but she was always engaging.”
This makes me want to read the book. I love anything with strong characters, the plot is secondary. I’ll have to keep this in mind when I let myself by books again.
I think much the same way – as long as the character are interesting and believable I can forgive the author for failings in other areas.
Pingback: 10% Report: 100 Years of Books « Fleur in her World