Back in the 1920s Margaret Kennedy’s second novel, ‘The Constant Nymph’, was a huge, huge success. It was one of the bestselling novels of the decade, it became a successful stage play and then Margaret Kennedy was called upon to write a screenplay. That led her to more work in Britain’s film industry, and that experience underpins this novel.
Roy Collins had been smitten with photography and cinema since boyhood, and when he grew up he set about working his way up in the cinema business. He had secured a job working on scripts for BBB – Blech Bernstein British!
Dorothy Harding had been a Victorian novelist. She had never married but she had supported her family, writing moral tales that were popular in their day but would quickly be forgotten. Dorothy would have been forgotten, had her diary and her poems not come to light after her death. They revealed a very different side of the author, and literary critic Alec Mundy published a book suggesting that the ‘G’ Dorothy wrote of with such passion was the man that she had loved and her sister had married. Playwright Adelaide Lassiter had taken that theory and turned it into a grandly romantic film that had become a huge hit and was going to be turned into a film.
And that was where Roy came in!
He had an uneasy feeling about the job. He was disappointed that the Harding family were only interested in the income that that film would bring them, he was interested that the there was such love for the author in the countryside around her home, and he began to wonder if the critic and the playwright had got things wrong.
Roy was right. The story stepped back into the past to tell Dorothy’s story.
The earlier chapters had been wonderful. A lovely introduction, as Roy visited the schoolteacher aunt who had understood him better than his parents ever had and spoken with her about what he was doing, set the story up beautifully. The gentle but knowing satire of the film business was so very well down. And Harding family, living in genteel poverty in a run-down country house, quite oblivious to the fact that the world had changed, were captured beautifully.
The interlude in the past was even finer; I thought that I might have met the loveliest Victorian novelist I had encountered before; I realised that Margaret Kennedy had planned her story so very, very cleverly.
Dorothy’s real story was much deeper, much more moving than the story that the critic and the playwright had spun; and yet it was understandable that they had drawn the conclusions that they did. Dorothy had grown from an imaginative child into an intelligent woman, but her life had been sheltered, she was naïve about so any things, and her family and others had exploited that, and her good nature.
Margaret Kennedy’s work is informed by her love of Jane Austen, but Dorothy’s story suggests that she knew and loved the Brontes too ….
Roy loved his job, but he knew that he had to do the right thing; he had to clear Dorothy’s reputation of the romantic fantasy the poet and playwright had concocted, even if it did cost him his job.
I loved that way that the story played out. The playwright was disappointed that the truth failed to live up to her romantic fantasy, but she decided that she had to represent her heroine honestly. That was lovely. The film company and the leading lady pulled back from the project. That was understandable. And the critic – who surely should have done a little more research and a little less speculating – was determined to suppress the truth and preserve his reputation. That was worrying.
Margaret Kennedy is wonderfully clear-sighted and unsentimental, and not at all judgemental. She just presents that characters and tells the story, and yet I knew that she knew. And I agreed.
I loved Roy, I loved Dorothy, and I loved the way their stories were woven together.
This proved to be a story for the head and the heart.
There is much to reward careful reading; lovely details, allusions, and themes that echo through Margaret Kennedy’s work.
And the story of an woman whose reputation many are ready to tarnish, who accepts what life offers her and finds peace is both moving and memorable.
Oh my–this is such a fascinating plot! Love your review; putting this on my list to read perhaps next. 🙂 Your comments reminded me that Kennedy wrote a bio of Jane Austen–if I have that right?
I am answering my own question–I knew I had read this somewhere! Margaret Kennedy’s book (brief bio/commentary) on Jane Austen is given a lovely review from Simon at Stuck in a Book.
Claire at The Captive Reader speaks highly of the Austen book, and I ust track down a copy. But in the meantime I have Outlaws on Parnassus, MK’s book about the art of the novelist …
So strange. I know I started this one; it’s in my LibraryThing inventory. But I must not have finished it. Alas, I no longer have my copy of it, as I’d like to give it another try.
It’s definitely worth finding a copy and finishing. Luckily this one is back in prine, so it shouldn’t be difficult to get another copy.
I think Kennedy is a wonderful storyteller and this sounds really unusual – another one onto the wishlist!!
It’s an unusual combination of elements, but it works really well.
Lovely and teasing review – you make me want to pick it up immediately and fall into this world. I really like the theme of the writer inside the writing too. This week is going to unearth so many lost treasures, I can just feel it.
That’s the object of the exercise! I’ve never found a Kennedy novel that didn’t have something to recommend it
Oh I want to read this now – it sounds like perfect for booklovers with the writers writing about writers…
There’s not so much about the writing itself, but it is an intriguing and very readable book. It’s lovely that Vintage has brought it back into print.
I am almost through “The Feast” (LOVING IT by the way) and I am going to start with this one right after that!! How can i resist such a wonderful plot???
It is a wonderful plot, and I’m sure you’ll love this one too.
Sounds very engaging and yet I’d never heard of it before! Thank goodness for Margaret Kennedy Reading Week! 😉
Pingback: Margaret Kennedy Reading Week: Updates and a Book to be Won « Fleur in her World
Jane, I loved this book as well! Both Roy and Dorothy are such wonderful characters, and I could have read a whole book with Aunt May. I had noted the Bronte allusion but forgot to note it, among all the other riches. I think this book would rank second after Lucy Carmichael, for me. Thank you again for hosting this reading week,
Pingback: Margaret Kennedy Reading Week: A Look Back – and a Winner « Fleur in her World
Pingback: Last Month’s Reading and Next Reading « Fleur in her World